
For a long time I shot on crop, I started with 1100 d, then 550 d, then 60 d, 70 d, 7 d. It so happened that one camera was mine, the other at the institute, the third in the editorial office, where I worked as a correspondent. And there were crops everywhere. And so I decided to take a camera for weddings better than 60 d, with which I worked at that time. In a crisis, the choice, of course, was limited only to models up to 100 thousand, and this is 7d mark 2 and 6d. After a long reading on the Internet, the question arose of what to sacrifice, quality or ergonomics, I came to the conclusion that it is better to take 6 d, since the quality at high ISO and in general is still higher . After 40 thousand runs, I can conclude that it would be better if I took a 7d mark 2. Yes, the ISO of 6 is high, but in practice I almost never used ISO above 1000-1600, since all the optics are fast aperture and I don’t need beyond the limiting ISO at all . But, I can say that the picture of 6 d is still good and the ravines stretch perfectly)) In general, when choosing these carcasses, it is important to understand what you are willing to sacrifice .

Уровневые штативы и моноподы для камер Neewer
11 Отзывов

Штатив SIRUI AM-284 для путешествий из углеродного волокна, профессиональный штатив для камеры с 4-секционными ножками, поворотными замками для ножек, съемными металлическими шипами, нагрузка до 33 фунтов
11 Отзывов

1K Ball Head от Joby: повысьте стабильность и маневренность вашей камеры
14 Отзывов

Гибкая подставка для штатива для небольших камер: 6,5-дюймовый гибкий штатив Acuvar с чистящей салфеткой из микрофибры
33 Отзыва